The information and knowledge demonstrated was collected within the context regarding greater browse programs, and this contains a detailed sociodemographic and you can relationship testing, as well as other bills within the extent from close dating

According to complete lifetime of the connection, an average, in years, for the more statuses discussed is, respectively: 2.89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = dos.97), one another organizations varying anywhere between 6 months and you can eleven numerous years of relationship; seven.76 (SD = 4.01), ranging from one or two and you will 19 decades; and you may (SD = 4.82), ranging from less than annually and 30 years. 8%) and you will stayed which have nearest and dearest, when you’re men and women managing its couples were primarily performing someone (69.2%), from which 53% had college or university or postgraduate level. Of one’s formal relationship players, 67% had school otherwise article-scholar degrees, at which 89.8% was employed, 2% retired and you will 8.2% unemployed. The functional state to your hitched players are equivalent: 89.5% had been doing work, 2.9% have been resigned and you will six.3% have been out of work, and you will 1.3% called various other a job condition. Inside group, 62.5% of one’s users had college or university otherwise postgraduate level.

Individual commitment try evaluated depending on the Portuguese version (Table 1) of your own reduced style of brand new Time and effort Measure (Stanley, 1986), that was interpreted according to adopting the interpretation and retroversion steps: after permission got because of the creator, the initial size is interpreted by a couple of experts in industry, both of these translations have been exposed to retroversion by several professionals, you to bilingual and something experienced in using the brand new English language; ultimately, per adaptation try than the brand new scale, opting for the use of new conditions and you can things which have better distance to help you they. New Portuguese type ergo contained the brand new 14 amazing things and you will a similar respond to size and you may is entitled, just after deliberation because of the cluster, the personal Relationship Level (‘Escala de Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). Into the last stage of your own interpretation procedure, brand new instrument is actually applied to 3 participants for the goal of confirming the brand new adequateness of the code additionally the unambiguous understanding of things, which have been chatted about into the players just after applying of this new questionnaire. Since there were no comments claiming or even, stuff stayed the same.

Resulting from an up-date of your brand new Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, that it tool is intended to scale dating high quality feeling, with the hope that, with respect to the theoretical presumptions, one another bills often positively correlate

Relationship Quality, chosen to verify criteria validity, was measured with the Relationship Rating Form–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt. by Lind, 2008). The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating escort in Escondido scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.