On probability of kissing to your target, there is certainly a significant communication between grandiose narcissism and fellow member sex, ? = .161, t = dos.819, p = .005. So it communication are demonstrated inside Fig dos. The straightforward mountains for males (easy hill = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you can girls (effortless hill = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) were not high. Grandiose narcissists failed to express an increased probability of kissing with a connected target more just one (? = .068, t = step 1.127, p = .261), suggesting you to definitely grandiose narcissism was not from the mate poaching to have a short-title affair.
Grandiose narcissists have a tendency to declaration partner poaching -particularly for the brand new small-identity . But not, a question stays concerning whether they get a hold of people in dating significantly more worthy of looking for than simply those people who are unmarried. Widman and you can McNulty reason that grandiose narcissistic tendencies might be activated across items typically (including the self-report away from lifestyle frequency from intimate conclusion), however be triggered when placed in a specific state. Hence, you’ll be able that grandiose narcissists reveal a reputation engaging in companion poaching, but don’t always pick those in matchmaking to get top mates. We tested so it chance for the four studies.
Partner poaching catalog.
For long-term mate poaching, grandiose narcissism is actually a critical predictor for women (? = .306, t aplicaciones de citas con personas pequeñas para iphone = 2.623, p = .010) and you will a somewhat extreme predictor for men (? = .218, t = 1.725, p = .088). Nothing of Huge Four variables had been significant. Grandiose narcissism was not a serious predictor regarding achievement at the poaching towards the enough time-identity for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nonetheless it are for ladies (? = .340, t = dos.369, p = .021). Not one of your own additional factors have been extreme with the exception of ladies’ neuroticism; when women was basically so much more neurotic, it advertised a great deal more success within poaching for some time-label sexual relationships.
Results
Of great interest, grandiose narcissism was not of mate poaching among males. That it result is in line with performance claimed from the Kardum and you may associates . For this reason, you’ll be able you to grandiose narcissistic women are more frequently guilty from mate poaching.
Materials and techniques
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.